2 min readfrom Machine Learning

[R] 94.42% on BANKING77 Official Test Split with Lightweight Embedding + Example Reranking (strict full-train protocol)

[R] 94.42% on BANKING77 Official Test Split with Lightweight Embedding + Example Reranking (strict full-train protocol)
[R] 94.42% on BANKING77 Official Test Split with Lightweight Embedding + Example Reranking (strict full-train protocol)

BANKING77 (77 fine-grained banking intents) is a well-established but increasingly saturated intent classification benchmark.

did this while using a lightweight embedding-based classifier + example reranking approach (no LLMs involved), I obtained 94.42% accuracy on the official PolyAI test split.

Strict Full train protocol was used: Hyperparameter tuning / recipe selection performed via 5-fold stratified CV on the official training set only, final model retrained on 100% of the official training data (recipe frozen) and single evaluation on the held-out official PolyAI test split

Here are the results: Accuracy: 94.42%, Macro-F1: 0.9441, Model size: ~68 MiB (FP32), Inference: ~225 ms per query

This represents +0.59pp over the commonly cited 93.83% baseline and places the result in clear 2nd place on the public leaderboard (0.52pp behind the current SOTA of 94.94%), unless there is a new one that I am not finding.

https://preview.redd.it/utnom6v0pntg1.png?width=1082&format=png&auto=webp&s=6ae505e9131b8d62ca6b293fe14e6a74b557d926

submitted by /u/califalcon
[link] [comments]

Want to read more?

Check out the full article on the original site

View original article

Tagged with

#rows.com
#financial modeling with spreadsheets
#big data management in spreadsheets
#generative AI for data analysis
#conversational data analysis
#cloud-based spreadsheet applications
#Excel alternatives for data analysis
#real-time data collaboration
#intelligent data visualization
#data visualization tools
#enterprise data management
#big data performance
#data analysis tools
#data cleaning solutions